Age-based comparisons of patients undergoing secondary rhytidectomy.

BACKGROUND Statistics published by The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery report a 48% increase in cosmetic procedures for 2000-2001 and a 14% increase for rhytidectomies alone. Patients aged 35 to 50 account for 30.2% of all rhytidectomies performed. Many of these patients undergo secondary rhytidectomy. OBJECTIVE We investigated differences between patients undergoing secondary rhytidectomy and those undergoing a primary rhytidectomy, and between older (more than 60 years) and younger (60 years or less) patients undergoing secondary rhytidectomy. METHODS A retrospective descriptive research design with the computer cross-filing system of the senior author (A.M.) was reviewed for patients undergoing secondary or more (ie, tertiary, quaternary, etc) rhytidectomy. A total of 113 consecutive patients were identified; charts from 98 female patients and 3 male patients, were available for review. Ages at the time of surgery ranged from 40 to 81 years, with an average of 60. RESULTS Among patients older than 60 undergoing secondary face lift, 41 of 53 patients (77%) had combined procedures with their most recent face lift; 39 of 53 (74%) of these patients had at least one comorbid medical condition. Among patients aged 60 or younger undergoing secondary face lift, 37 of 48 patients (77%) underwent multiple procedures along with their most recent face lift, and 16 of 48 patients (33%) had at least one comorbid medical condition. The overall complication rate was 2/101 (2%). CONCLUSIONS There is a statistically significant increase in the number of comorbid medical conditions in older patients. The overall complication rate in patients undergoing secondary rhytidectomy compares favorably to that traditionally quoted for patients undergoing primary rhytidectomy, who on average are younger at the time of surgery. This suggests that in properly screened patients, even in older patients with combined ancillary procedures, secondary face lifting is both common and safe. (Aesthetic Surg J 2002;22:526-530.).